Legislative Positions of the Judicial Branch
 Bill Number Description/Concerns Official Position Judicial Contact Status

SB 101

SB 101 would authorize weapons permit holders to carry guns into unsecured buildings which house government offices, and this provision could be read to include courthouses. The Judicial Council supports the placement of language in SB 101 that states “courthouses as defined by Code Section 16-11-127 are prohibited places for carrying weapons.”

Support AOC Public Safety and Homeland Security Committee 
HB 438

HB 438 amends O.C.G.A. § 15-23-7 to increase the maximum filing fee that may be charged and collected by local programs to support court-connected or court-referred alternative dispute resolution (ADR) programs from $7.50 to $10 per civil filing.

Support AOC   House Judiciary Committee

              HB 579

HB 579 allows members of the Georgia Judicial Retirement System serving in full-time positions at their retirement to use prior part-time service for purposes of vesting, on the same one-month credit per three-months part-time service currently used for calculating benefits.

Support State Court
 House Retirement Committee
HB 1000

Tax intercept legislation would allow for debt collection from state income tax refunds for unpaid fines and fees due the court.

Support AOC  
SB 345

A general law allowing local courts to establish technology fees would: (1) alleviate concerns that piecemeal implementation is not in keeping with uniformity requirements; and (2) provide a consistent process for adoption by any court. This would also shorten the process for approving a fee since specific action by the General Assembly would no longer be required.

Support  AOC  
SB 332

Raise the maximum fine for contempt in magistrate courts from $200 to $500.

Support Magistrate Court  

 

 

This site is for information purposes only. It is provided as a courtesy to inform visitors of legislation relating to the courts.

Unless otherwise specifically stated, when a measure is posted on this site it does not imply the Judicial Council or any Council or Judicial Agency endorses the legislation or that the council has taken a formal position on the issue.